Francis PURDY

vers 1616 - 1658  (42 ans)

• Nom	Francis PURDY
  Naissance	vers 1616
  Genre	Masculin
  Décès	2 oct 1658	Fairfield,,,Connecticut,Usa,
  _CREA	17 sept 2023
  _FIL	LEGITIMATE_CHILD
  ID personne	I65311	Arbour-Pierre1615
  Dernière modif.	16 sept 2023

  
  

  Famille	Mary Elizabeth BRUNDAGE,   n. 10 déc 1628, Ipswich,,,,England,County Of Suffolk d. 15 sept 1684, Rockingham County,,,New York,Usa,Rye (Âgé de 55 ans)
  Mariage	5 août 1642
  _CREA	21 août 2024
  _UST	MARRIED
  Enfants	+ 1. Joseph PURDY,   n. vers 1653, Fairfield,,,Connecticut,Usa, d. 29 oct 1709, Rockingham County,,,New York,Usa,Rye (Âgé de 56 ans)
  ID Famille	F15840	Feuille familiale  |  Tableau familial
  Dernière modif.	21 août 2024

  
  

• Carte d'événements

  Décès - 2 oct 1658 - Fairfield,,,Connecticut,Usa,  = Lien Google Earth

  
  

• Notes

  ! <http://boards.ancestry.com/surnames.purdy/48.157.1.1.2.1.1/mb.ashx>Re: decendant of Francis Purdy, 1595Alec PurdyPosted: 21 Feb 2006Classification: QuerySurnames:Yes, we don't have any indication that the Francis who was baptized at the church at Brundall is the same man. That family moved away from Brundall after 1615 and we need to find out where they went. There are lots of historical reasons to think that they are different:The land that Francis and Mary lived on in Fairfield was hiswife's inheritance, and although there is record of Rachel Brundish's selling her home lot in Wethersfield there is no record of Francis ever owning land. Francis certainly wasn't living in Fairfield when he got married, and hisbride was very young, so the logical conclusion is that Francis knew the Brundish family well for a period of time before they married and he had to have been living near them ie at Wethersfield.If Francis was born in 1595 he was getting pretty long in the tooth by thetime he got married, about at the end of life expectancy. Doesn't makesense that the Brundishes would marry their daughter to an old guy whodidn't own anything. However if he was born about 1615 he'd be a teenager and would be living with theBrundish family in 1636/37 when they went to Wethersfield from MA so he didn't need to own land and wouldn't leave any records. Goodreason to give one of the lots that John Brundishhad bought to the young couple as a dowry. I suspect that he may have been an orphan or came over to help the Brundishes, either way his parents knew the Brundishes in England. Just more guesses, but I think theymake more sense. Can hardly wait to get a DNA link to England!Alec